VERS vs. FTEC
VERS (ProShares Metaverse ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - VERS tracks the Solactive Metaverse Theme Index - Benchmark TR Net while FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VERS returned 31.89%/yr vs 33.93%/yr for FTEC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VERS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
VERS vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VERS achieves a 36.54% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's 31.89% return.
VERS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 23.22%
- YTD
- 36.54%
- 6M
- 36.31%
- 1Y
- 68.21%
- 3Y*
- 31.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 18.21%
- YTD
- 31.89%
- 6M
- 30.74%
- 1Y
- 60.87%
- 3Y*
- 33.93%
- 5Y*
- 22.49%
- 10Y*
- 25.57%
VERS vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF | 36.54% | 26.16% | 16.92% | 51.13% | -34.52% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 31.89% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -18.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between VERS and FTEC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between VERS and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
VERS vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VERS
FTEC
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
VERS
FTEC
Communication Services
VERS
FTEC
Consumer Cyclical
VERS
FTEC
Real Estate
VERS
FTEC
-
Basic Materials
VERS
-
FTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
VERS
-
FTEC
-
Energy
VERS
-
FTEC
Financial Services
VERS
-
FTEC
Healthcare
VERS
-
FTEC
-
Industrials
VERS
-
FTEC
Utilities
VERS
-
FTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VERS vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
VERS
FTEC
VERS vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VERS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.48 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.76 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 12.10 | -3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VERS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.97 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.99 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
VERS vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VERS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.13% | -34.95% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -16.26% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.34% | -27.30% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -1.49% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -5.56% | -9.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 5.05% | +2.87% |
Volatility
VERS vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 6.43%. This indicates that VERS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VERS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 6.43% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.43% | 16.14% | +4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.54% | 20.63% | +5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 25.23% | +6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 24.69% | +6.57% |
VERS vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VERS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
VERS vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than FTEC's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.32% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF | 0.24% | 0.52% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VERS and FTEC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VERS has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to FTEC (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VERS dropped -42.13% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 3-year performance, FTEC leads with 33.93% vs 31.89% for VERS. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 33.93% return vs 31.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for VERS.
FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.24% for VERS.
VERS tracks Solactive Metaverse Theme Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VERS and 0.08% for FTEC.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VERS and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer