PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VERS vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VERS vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VERS achieves a 18.73% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 48.87% return.


VERS

1D
-1.78%
1M
-7.20%
YTD
18.73%
6M
18.43%
1Y
40.58%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
-3.31%
1M
-19.00%
YTD
48.87%
6M
46.64%
1Y
44.16%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VERS vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VERS
ProShares Metaverse ETF
18.73%26.16%16.92%51.13%-33.05%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
48.87%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%8.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VERS and DBE is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.05

The correlation between VERS and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VERS vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VERS
VERS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VERS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VERS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VERS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VERS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VERS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VERS vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VERSDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.86

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

6.74

-1.81

VERS vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VERS Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VERS and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VERS vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VERSDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.13%

-86.69%

+44.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.02%

-23.89%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.34%

-23.89%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.91%

-43.48%

+29.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.97%

-57.24%

+42.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

6.57%

+1.70%

Volatility

VERS vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) at 9.69%. This indicates that VERS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VERSDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.40%

9.69%

+4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.80%

31.65%

-7.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.15%

34.90%

-5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.69%

29.62%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.69%

28.36%

+3.33%

VERS vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VERS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

VERS vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than DBE's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.60%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
VERS
ProShares Metaverse ETF
0.28%0.52%0.58%0.63%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VERS and DBE have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VERS has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to DBE (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VERS dropped -42.13% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, VERS leads with 25.49% vs 15.52% for DBE. On fees, VERS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DBE has been the lower-risk option at 9.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VERS has performed better with a 25.49% return vs 15.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VERS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.28% for VERS.

VERS is categorized as Technology Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. VERS tracks Solactive Metaverse Theme Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VERS and 0.78% for DBE.

VERS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VERS and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer