VERG.L vs. VDPG.L
VERG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating) and VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VERG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VERG.L returned 9.50%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for VDPG.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VERG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VDPG.L.
Performance
VERG.L vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VERG.L achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly lower than VDPG.L's 53.85% return.
VERG.L
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- —
VDPG.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 15.08%
- YTD
- 53.85%
- 6M
- 59.61%
- 1Y
- 91.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
VERG.L vs. VDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VERG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating | 6.82% | 27.17% | 1.89% | 15.33% | -7.05% | 16.27% | 8.72% | 1.99% |
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 53.85% | 30.58% | -3.05% | 4.09% | -1.89% | 1.95% | 15.56% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between VERG.L and VDPG.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between VERG.L and VDPG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VERG.L vs. VDPG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Industrials
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Healthcare
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Technology
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Consumer Defensive
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Utilities
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Basic Materials
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Energy
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Communication Services
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Real Estate
VERG.L
VDPG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VERG.L vs. VDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VERG.L
VDPG.L
VERG.L vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VERG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VERG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.81 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 6.87 | -5.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 25.62 | -19.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VERG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 4.56 | -3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.86 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.75 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
VERG.L vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VERG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.55%, smaller than the maximum VDPG.L drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERG.L and VDPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VERG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.55% | -30.11% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -13.45% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.10% | -16.71% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -17.64% | -2.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -0.73% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -5.88% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 3.61% | -0.45% |
Volatility
VERG.L vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VERG.L) is 4.23%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that VERG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VERG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 10.34% | -6.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 17.86% | -6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 20.26% | -7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 15.89% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 18.41% | -1.91% |
VERG.L vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VERG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VDPG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VERG.L vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VERG.L nor VDPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VERG.L and VDPG.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VERG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VERG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VDPG.L.
VERG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VDPG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. VERG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VERG.L and 0.15% for VDPG.L.
Find the right allocation for VERG.L and VDPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer