VERG.L vs. CMU.L
VERG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - VERG.L tracks the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VERG.L returned 9.50%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VERG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.
Performance
VERG.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VERG.L is traded in GBP, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VERG.L achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return.
VERG.L
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- —
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
VERG.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VERG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating | 6.82% | 27.17% | 1.89% | 15.33% | -7.05% | 16.27% | 8.72% | 1.12% |
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.89% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 4.59% | 0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between VERG.L and CMU.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VERG.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
VERG.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VERG.L
CMU.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VERG.L
CMU.L
Industrials
VERG.L
CMU.L
Healthcare
VERG.L
CMU.L
Technology
VERG.L
CMU.L
Consumer Cyclical
VERG.L
CMU.L
Consumer Defensive
VERG.L
CMU.L
Utilities
VERG.L
CMU.L
Basic Materials
VERG.L
CMU.L
Energy
VERG.L
CMU.L
Communication Services
VERG.L
CMU.L
Real Estate
VERG.L
CMU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VERG.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank
VERG.L
CMU.L
VERG.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VERG.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VERG.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.37 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 2.58 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 9.67 | -3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VERG.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.98 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.66 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
VERG.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VERG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.55%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERG.L and CMU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VERG.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.55% | -32.53% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -11.43% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.10% | -11.95% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -21.11% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -0.18% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -5.80% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 3.05% | +0.11% |
Volatility
VERG.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VERG.L) is 4.23%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that VERG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VERG.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 5.34% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 12.44% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 14.86% | -1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 16.00% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 16.78% | -0.28% |
VERG.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VERG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VERG.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VERG.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VERG.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VERG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VERG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.
VERG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VERG.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.
Find the right allocation for VERG.L and CMU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer