VEQT.TO vs. CASV.TO
VEQT.TO (Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio) and CASV.TO (Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while CASV.TO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEQT.TO charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CASV.TO.
Performance
VEQT.TO vs. CASV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 29.52%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CASV.TO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEQT.TO vs. CASV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VEQT.TO Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 14.58% |
CASV.TO Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF | 13.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEQT.TO and CASV.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEQT.TO vs. CASV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VEQT.TO
CASV.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VEQT.TO vs. CASV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO) and Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF (CASV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEQT.TO | CASV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.57 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEQT.TO vs. CASV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.45%, which is greater than CASV.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEQT.TO and CASV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEQT.TO | CASV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.45% | -3.70% | -26.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -2.31% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -1.01% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility
VEQT.TO vs. CASV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEQT.TO | CASV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 15.96% | -3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 15.96% | -2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 15.96% | -0.20% |
VEQT.TO vs. CASV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEQT.TO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CASV.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEQT.TO vs. CASV.TO - Dividend Comparison
VEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while CASV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASV.TO Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEQT.TO Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.23% | 1.42% | 1.58% | 1.88% | 2.09% | 1.40% | 1.48% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEQT.TO and CASV.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CASV.TO.
VEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CASV.TO is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for VEQT.TO and 0.39% for CASV.TO.
Find the right allocation for VEQT.TO and CASV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer