PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMT.L vs. EMBE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMT.L vs. EMBE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEMT.L is traded in GBP, while EMBE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EMBE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMT.L achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than EMBE.L's 0.26% return.


VEMT.L

1D
0.03%
1M
1.60%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.13%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*

EMBE.L

1D
0.36%
1M
1.03%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.23%
1Y
11.72%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*
1.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMT.L vs. EMBE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
1.55%4.07%8.08%3.44%-5.19%-0.56%2.53%9.67%2.79%-1.59%
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.26%16.93%-0.73%5.50%-16.76%-9.01%9.20%5.91%-7.50%12.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMT.L and EMBE.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2016

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between VEMT.L and EMBE.L has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMT.L vs. EMBE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMT.L
VEMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

EMBE.L
EMBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMT.L vs. EMBE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEMT.LEMBE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.25

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

7.44

-0.58

VEMT.L vs. EMBE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMT.L and EMBE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEMT.LEMBE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.75

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

-0.02

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.18

+0.12

Drawdowns

VEMT.L vs. EMBE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMT.L drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum EMBE.L drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMT.L and EMBE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMT.LEMBE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-33.24%

+18.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.31%

-5.20%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.59%

-7.25%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.41%

-29.29%

+17.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-8.17%

+7.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-11.29%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.57%

-0.04%

Volatility

VEMT.L vs. EMBE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) is 1.33%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that VEMT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMBE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMT.LEMBE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

2.37%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

5.25%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

6.73%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

9.85%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.15%

11.14%

-1.99%

VEMT.L vs. EMBE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBE.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEMT.L vs. EMBE.L - Dividend Comparison

VEMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than EMBE.L's 5.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.63%5.44%5.64%5.50%5.39%3.92%3.85%4.77%5.75%3.88%5.36%4.72%
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.92%6.17%5.74%5.56%4.88%3.81%4.47%4.46%4.44%4.81%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMT.L and EMBE.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEMT.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEMT.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMBE.L.

VEMT.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while EMBE.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified Hedge TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEMT.L and 0.50% for EMBE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMT.L and EMBE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer