VEM vs. IEMG
VEM (Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. VEM is actively managed, while IEMG is passively managed. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. VEM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
VEM vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VEM
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $816.86M | $1.11B | $1.08B | |
| $1.18K | $2.76K | $6.90K |
VEM vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VEM Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 2.66% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEM and IEMG is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.97 |
VEM vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEM
IEMG
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Technology
VEM
IEMG
Financial Services
VEM
IEMG
Industrials
VEM
IEMG
Basic Materials
VEM
IEMG
Energy
VEM
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
VEM
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
VEM
IEMG
Communication Services
VEM
IEMG
Utilities
VEM
IEMG
Real Estate
VEM
IEMG
Healthcare
VEM
-
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEM vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
VEM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IEMG
VEM vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (VEM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEM vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEM drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEM and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -38.71% | +25.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.26% | -13.78% | +2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -12.90% | +8.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.38% | — |
Volatility
VEM vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.70% | 23.41% | +7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.70% | 19.20% | +11.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.70% | 20.28% | +10.42% |
VEM vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEM vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
VEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than IEMG's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.42% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
VEM Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VEM and IEMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for VEM.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 2.14% for VEM.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VEM and 0.09% for IEMG.
Find the right allocation for VEM and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer