PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEM vs. ASGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEM vs. ASGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (VEM) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VEM

1D
0.33%
1M
1.08%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASGM

1D
0.22%
1M
0.03%
6M
14.35%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEM vs. ASGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VEM and ASGM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEM vs. ASGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (VEM) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VEM vs. ASGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEM vs. ASGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEM drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, which is greater than ASGM's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEM and ASGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMASGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.55%

-6.62%

-6.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-4.96%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-1.53%

-2.55%

Volatility

VEM vs. ASGM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMASGMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.97%

16.92%

+14.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.97%

16.92%

+14.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.97%

16.92%

+14.05%

VEM vs. ASGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGM's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEM vs. ASGM - Dividend Comparison

VEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than ASGM's 3.86% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


VEM and ASGM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.

ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.02% for VEM.

VEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ASGM is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VEM and 0.86% for ASGM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEM and ASGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer