PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEGA vs. INKM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEGA vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEGA achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly higher than INKM's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, VEGA has outperformed INKM with an annualized return of 7.95%, while INKM has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.


VEGA

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.04%
YTD
7.10%
6M
6.87%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
7.95%

INKM

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.93%
YTD
5.61%
6M
5.74%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
5.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEGA vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
7.10%15.83%11.20%15.12%-15.02%12.36%8.37%19.29%-6.58%11.50%
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
5.61%11.86%5.70%10.26%-12.58%8.52%3.11%17.12%-5.32%13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VEGA and INKM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2012

0.62

The correlation between VEGA and INKM shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEGA vs. INKM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEGA
INKM

Technology

31.7%
13.2%

Financial Services

14.6%
8.3%

Industrials

10.8%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.1%

Communication Services

9.3%
6.2%

Healthcare

8.4%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
8.6%

Energy

3.5%
11.1%

Utilities

2.6%
13.9%

Basic Materials

2.6%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
10.9%

Technology

VEGA
31.7%
INKM
13.2%

Financial Services

VEGA
14.6%
INKM
8.3%

Industrials

VEGA
10.8%
INKM
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VEGA
10.1%
INKM
5.1%

Communication Services

VEGA
9.3%
INKM
6.2%

Healthcare

VEGA
8.4%
INKM
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

VEGA
4.6%
INKM
8.6%

Energy

VEGA
3.5%
INKM
11.1%

Utilities

VEGA
2.6%
INKM
13.9%

Basic Materials

VEGA
2.6%
INKM
1.4%

Real Estate

VEGA
1.8%
INKM
10.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEGA vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEGA
VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

INKM
INKM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEGA vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEGAINKMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.87

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.41

11.30

+1.10

VEGA vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEGA Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the INKM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEGA and INKM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEGAINKMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.20

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.48

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.57

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.57

-0.05

Drawdowns

VEGA vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEGA drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, roughly equal to the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEGA and INKM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEGAINKMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

-28.58%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-4.55%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-9.25%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

-19.18%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

-28.58%

+0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.33%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-3.69%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.15%

+0.37%

Volatility

VEGA vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 1.67%. This indicates that VEGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEGAINKMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

1.67%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

4.59%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

5.95%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.29%

8.30%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

9.78%

+2.92%

VEGA vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEGA has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEGA vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

VEGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than INKM's 4.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
4.86%5.82%4.83%4.56%5.03%3.74%3.88%4.38%4.08%3.10%3.39%3.45%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
1.25%1.34%1.05%1.12%1.89%0.55%0.28%0.44%0.45%0.00%0.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEGA and INKM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEGA has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEGA dropped -28.37% vs INKM's -28.58%.

On 10-year performance, VEGA leads with 7.95% vs 5.59% for INKM. On fees, INKM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEGA has performed better with a 7.95% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INKM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 1.25% for VEGA.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 2.02% for VEGA and 0.50% for INKM.

INKM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEGA and INKM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer