PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VDY.TO (Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF) and XGRO.TO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - VDY.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index, while XGRO.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. VDY.TO is passively managed, while XGRO.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDY.TO returned 14.58%/yr vs 10.48%/yr for XGRO.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VDY.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XGRO.TO.

Performance

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDY.TO achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly higher than XGRO.TO's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, VDY.TO has outperformed XGRO.TO with an annualized return of 14.58%, while XGRO.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.48% annualized return.

VDY.TO

1D
0.65%
1M
6.60%
YTD
23.81%
6M
23.43%
1Y
49.48%
3Y*
27.42%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
14.58%

XGRO.TO

1D
0.47%
1M
2.38%
YTD
10.06%
6M
9.06%
1Y
22.44%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDY.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF		23.81%29.21%21.44%8.41%-0.23%36.60%-1.37%21.42%-10.09%8.32%
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		10.06%15.62%20.17%15.06%-11.05%14.34%11.58%18.04%-6.52%11.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VDY.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2012

0.54

The correlation between VDY.TO and XGRO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VDY.TO
XGRO.TO

Financial Services

56.0%
17.8%

Energy

30.8%
6.4%

Utilities

4.1%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
6.1%

Communication Services

2.8%
5.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
3.6%

Technology

0.4%
21.9%

Industrials

0.2%
8.3%

Healthcare

0.1%
5.0%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Financial Services

VDY.TO
56.0%
XGRO.TO
17.8%

Energy

VDY.TO
30.8%
XGRO.TO
6.4%

Utilities

VDY.TO
4.1%
XGRO.TO
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VDY.TO
3.0%
XGRO.TO
6.1%

Communication Services

VDY.TO
2.8%
XGRO.TO
5.8%

Basic Materials

VDY.TO
2.2%
XGRO.TO
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

VDY.TO
0.4%
XGRO.TO
3.6%

Technology

VDY.TO
0.4%
XGRO.TO
21.9%

Industrials

VDY.TO
0.2%
XGRO.TO
8.3%

Healthcare

VDY.TO
0.1%
XGRO.TO
5.0%

Real Estate

VDY.TO

-

XGRO.TO
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF

iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio

Often compared with VDY.TO:
VDY.TO vs. XEI.TOVDY.TO vs. XDIV.TOVDY.TO vs. VCN.TOVDY.TO vs. SCHDVDY.TO vs. XIC.TOVDY.TO vs. VCE.TOVDY.TO vs. ZDV.TO
Often compared with XGRO.TO:
XGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. VGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. VEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. XCG.TOXGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. XAW.TO

Return for Risk

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VDY.TO
VDY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VDY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
VDY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO
XGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VDY.TOXGRO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.98
2.03

+3.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
8.59
2.89

+5.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.21

1.38

+0.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.94

3.16

+12.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

64.95

13.90

+51.04

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.98, which is higher than the XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDY.TO and XGRO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDY.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.21%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDY.TO and XGRO.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VDY.TOXGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.21%

-47.99%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-7.12%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.38%

-12.47%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.17%

-18.38%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.21%

-25.85%

-13.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-8.50%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

1.62%

-0.86%

Volatility

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) is 3.27%, while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that VDY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VDY.TOXGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

3.96%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

9.53%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.32%

11.09%

-2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.58%

11.09%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

13.37%

+2.58%

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDY.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VDY.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

VDY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than XGRO.TO's 1.78% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDY.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF		2.83%3.59%4.37%4.64%4.42%3.46%4.59%4.25%4.44%3.42%3.25%4.11%
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		1.78%1.94%2.01%2.27%1.89%1.70%1.99%2.27%7.62%2.09%2.70%2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

VDY.TO and XGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VDY.TO.

VDY.TO is categorized as Dividend, while XGRO.TO is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VDY.TO and 0.20% for XGRO.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDY.TO and XGRO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer