VDY.TO vs. GLCC.TO
VDY.TO (Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF) and GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDY.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index, while GLCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. VDY.TO is passively managed, while GLCC.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDY.TO returned 14.58%/yr vs 13.89%/yr for GLCC.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDY.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for GLCC.TO.
Performance
VDY.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDY.TO achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly higher than GLCC.TO's -5.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VDY.TO having a 14.58% annualized return and GLCC.TO not far behind at 13.89%.
VDY.TO
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 23.43%
- 1Y
- 49.57%
- 3Y*
- 27.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
GLCC.TO
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -5.15%
- 6M
- -3.63%
- 1Y
- 48.60%
- 3Y*
- 40.00%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
VDY.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 23.81% | 29.21% | 21.44% | 8.41% | -0.23% | 36.60% | -1.37% | 21.42% | -10.09% | 8.32% |
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | -5.15% | 137.43% | 20.18% | 6.19% | -1.80% | -9.38% | 15.00% | 38.71% | -0.38% | 7.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDY.TO and GLCC.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2012 | 0.09 |
The correlation between VDY.TO and GLCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VDY.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
-
Energy
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
-
Utilities
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
-
Communication Services
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
-
Basic Materials
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
Consumer Defensive
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
-
Technology
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
-
Industrials
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
-
Healthcare
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
-
Real Estate
VDY.TO
-
GLCC.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDY.TO vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VDY.TO
GLCC.TO
VDY.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDY.TO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.21 | 1.23 | +0.98 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.94 | 1.53 | +14.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 64.95 | 4.34 | +60.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDY.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDY.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.21%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -81.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDY.TO and GLCC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDY.TO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.21% | -81.37% | +42.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.12% | -33.03% | +29.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.38% | -33.03% | +22.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.17% | -37.60% | +21.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.21% | -44.83% | +5.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -27.04% | +27.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -53.15% | +48.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 11.60% | -10.84% |
Volatility
VDY.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) is 3.27%, while Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a volatility of 16.63%. This indicates that VDY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDY.TO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 16.63% | -13.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 35.94% | -28.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.32% | 43.26% | -34.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.58% | 32.35% | -20.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 32.16% | -16.21% |
VDY.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDY.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCC.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDY.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
VDY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than GLCC.TO's 9.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 9.12% | 6.01% | 10.30% | 11.16% | 10.08% | 6.31% | 6.47% | 4.58% | 5.62% | 7.08% | 8.75% | 2.32% |
VDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 2.83% | 3.59% | 4.37% | 4.64% | 4.42% | 3.46% | 4.59% | 4.25% | 4.44% | 3.42% | 3.25% | 4.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDY.TO and GLCC.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDY.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLCC.TO.
VDY.TO is categorized as Dividend, while GLCC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VDY.TO and 0.79% for GLCC.TO.
Find the right allocation for VDY.TO and GLCC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer