VDU.TO vs. QDXH.TO
VDU.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF) and QDXH.TO (Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - VDU.TO tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index while QDXH.TO tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Hedged to CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VDU.TO returned 11.64%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for QDXH.TO. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VDU.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for QDXH.TO.
Performance
VDU.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDU.TO achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly higher than QDXH.TO's 12.29% return.
VDU.TO
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 30.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.93%
QDXH.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$99.52K | CA$61.24K | CA$41.60K | |
| CA$601.69K | CA$734.63K | CA$1.16M |
VDU.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDU.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF | 16.08% | 27.97% | 11.37% | 14.56% | -9.89% | 10.22% | 7.06% | 15.90% | -11.98% |
QDXH.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 12.29% | 21.99% | 13.25% | 14.25% | -2.55% | 20.52% | -0.42% | 20.43% | -12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDU.TO and QDXH.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018 | 0.21 |
The correlation between VDU.TO and QDXH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VDU.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Technology
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Industrials
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Healthcare
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Basic Materials
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Consumer Defensive
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Energy
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Utilities
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Communication Services
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Real Estate
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDU.TO vs. QDXH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VDU.TO
QDXH.TO
VDU.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDU.TO | QDXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.61 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.47 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.12 | 10.33 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDU.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, smaller than the maximum QDXH.TO drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDU.TO and QDXH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDU.TO | QDXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.19% | -31.75% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -9.85% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -13.49% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -15.79% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -0.71% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -3.81% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.36% | +0.62% |
Volatility
VDU.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO) at 3.12%. This indicates that VDU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDXH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDU.TO | QDXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 3.12% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.35% | 10.43% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 12.14% | +4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 12.78% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 15.42% | -0.75% |
VDU.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDU.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than QDXH.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VDU.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Dividend Comparison
VDU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than QDXH.TO's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDXH.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.29% | 2.41% | 2.64% | 2.76% | 2.92% | 2.28% | 1.96% | 2.65% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDU.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF | 2.02% | 2.61% | 2.55% | 2.54% | 2.14% | 2.66% | 1.64% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDU.TO and QDXH.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDXH.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDXH.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VDU.TO.
VDU.TO tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while QDXH.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Hedged to CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VDU.TO and 0.17% for QDXH.TO.
Find the right allocation for VDU.TO and QDXH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer