QDXH.TO vs. QTIP.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO) and Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QTIP.NEO).
QDXH.TO and QTIP.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDXH.TO is a passively managed fund by Mackenzie that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Hedged to CAD Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2018. QTIP.NEO is a passively managed fund by Mackenzie that tracks the performance of the Solactive US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Hedged to CAD TR Index. It was launched on Jan 24, 2018. Both QDXH.TO and QTIP.NEO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QDXH.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDXH.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDXH.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -1.14% | 22.00% | 13.25% | 14.25% | -2.55% | 20.52% | -0.42% | 20.43% | -12.11% |
QTIP.NEO Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.29% | 4.82% | 0.82% | 3.50% | -12.98% | 6.05% | 10.16% | 7.49% | -0.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDXH.TO achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than QTIP.NEO's 0.29% return.
QDXH.TO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -8.62%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 16.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- —
QTIP.NEO
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 1.29%
- 3Y*
- 1.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDXH.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
QDXH.TO vs. QTIP.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
QDXH.TO
QTIP.NEO
QDXH.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO) and Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QTIP.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDXH.TO | QTIP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.32 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 0.46 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.06 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 0.59 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.97 | 1.43 | +3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDXH.TO | QTIP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.32 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.09 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.34 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDXH.TO and QTIP.NEO is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QDXH.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Dividend Comparison
QDXH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than QTIP.NEO's 4.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDXH.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.82% | 2.41% | 2.64% | 2.76% | 2.92% | 2.28% | 1.96% | 2.65% | 3.13% |
QTIP.NEO Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.31% | 4.54% | 4.53% | 5.08% | 9.47% | 5.24% | 2.17% | 2.29% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
QDXH.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDXH.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than QTIP.NEO's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDXH.TO and QTIP.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDXH.TO | QTIP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -15.03% | -16.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -2.65% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -15.03% | -0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.04% | -4.64% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -4.80% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 1.09% | +1.78% |
Volatility
QDXH.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QTIP.NEO) at 1.37%. This indicates that QDXH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTIP.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDXH.TO | QTIP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 1.37% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 2.49% | +6.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 4.10% | +9.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 6.26% | +6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 6.36% | +8.88% |