VDU.TO vs. KNGG.TO
VDU.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF) and KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) are both Global Equities funds. VDU.TO is passively managed, while KNGG.TO is actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VDU.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VDU.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 7.62%
- YTD
- 16.22%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 33.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
KNGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDU.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VDU.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF | 11.71% |
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 6.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDU.TO and KNGG.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDU.TO vs. KNGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VDU.TO
KNGG.TO
VDU.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU.TO) and Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDU.TO | KNGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDU.TO | KNGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 2.48 | -1.79 |
Drawdowns
VDU.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, which is greater than KNGG.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDU.TO and KNGG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDU.TO | KNGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.19% | -3.26% | -25.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.56% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -1.19% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | — | — |
Volatility
VDU.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDU.TO | KNGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.68% | 16.22% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 16.22% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 16.22% | -1.47% |
Dividends
VDU.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Dividend Comparison
VDU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, while KNGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDU.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF | 2.09% | 2.61% | 2.55% | 2.54% | 2.14% | 2.67% | 1.64% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.26% | 2.41% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDU.TO and KNGG.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Brompton.
Find the right allocation for VDU.TO and KNGG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer