PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDPG.L vs. LYP6.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDPG.L vs. LYP6.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VDPG.L is traded in GBP, while LYP6.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYP6.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 53.85% return, which is significantly higher than LYP6.DE's 6.63% return.


VDPG.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
15.08%
YTD
53.85%
6M
59.61%
1Y
91.14%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*

LYP6.DE

1D
0.70%
1M
3.34%
YTD
6.63%
6M
9.00%
1Y
19.69%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDPG.L vs. LYP6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VDPG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc
53.85%30.58%-3.05%4.09%-1.89%1.95%15.56%1.01%
LYP6.DE
Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc
6.63%27.11%3.53%13.65%-5.50%16.00%3.83%3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VDPG.L and LYP6.DE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.66

The correlation between VDPG.L and LYP6.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDPG.L vs. LYP6.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDPG.L
VDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

LYP6.DE
LYP6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LYP6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDPG.L vs. LYP6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDPG.LLYP6.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.29

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.87

1.88

+4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.62

6.94

+18.68

VDPG.L vs. LYP6.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.56, which is higher than the LYP6.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDPG.L and LYP6.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDPG.LLYP6.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.56

1.57

+2.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.69

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.55

+0.20

Drawdowns

VDPG.L vs. LYP6.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than LYP6.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and LYP6.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDPG.LLYP6.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-27.65%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-10.41%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-13.78%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.64%

-16.91%

-0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-1.27%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-4.24%

-1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

2.83%

+0.78%

Volatility

VDPG.L vs. LYP6.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) at 4.11%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYP6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDPG.LLYP6.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.34%

4.11%

+6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.86%

10.55%

+7.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.26%

12.51%

+7.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

14.27%

+1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

15.55%

+2.86%

VDPG.L vs. LYP6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LYP6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDPG.L vs. LYP6.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VDPG.L nor LYP6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VDPG.L and LYP6.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYP6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYP6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VDPG.L.

VDPG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while LYP6.DE is Europe Equities. VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while LYP6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VDPG.L and 0.07% for LYP6.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDPG.L and LYP6.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer