VDPG.L vs. ESIE.DE
VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and ESIE.DE (iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while ESIE.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VDPG.L returned 12.82%/yr vs 19.28%/yr for ESIE.DE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDPG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIE.DE.
Performance
VDPG.L vs. ESIE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VDPG.L is traded in GBP, while ESIE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ESIE.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 47.65% return, which is significantly higher than ESIE.DE's 33.15% return.
VDPG.L
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 47.65%
- 6M
- 52.89%
- 1Y
- 79.33%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIE.DE
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 33.15%
- 6M
- 33.69%
- 1Y
- 49.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- —
VDPG.L vs. ESIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 47.65% | 30.58% | -3.06% | 4.10% | -1.89% | 1.95% | 7.25% |
ESIE.DE iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 33.15% | 21.21% | -10.70% | 6.47% | 42.99% | 25.74% | 6.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDPG.L and ESIE.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.29 |
The correlation between VDPG.L and ESIE.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDPG.L vs. ESIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VDPG.L
ESIE.DE
VDPG.L vs. ESIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDPG.L | ESIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.37 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.87 | 3.85 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.42 | 11.24 | +9.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDPG.L vs. ESIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.69%, which is greater than ESIE.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and ESIE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDPG.L | ESIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.69% | -26.24% | -14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -12.66% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.18% | -26.24% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -26.24% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | -8.64% | +3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -7.10% | -4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 4.35% | -0.48% |
Volatility
VDPG.L vs. ESIE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.DE) at 7.00%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDPG.L | ESIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.04% | 7.00% | +4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 20.12% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 23.11% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 23.48% | -2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 23.91% | -0.64% |
VDPG.L vs. ESIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VDPG.L vs. ESIE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither VDPG.L nor ESIE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VDPG.L and ESIE.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIE.DE.
VDPG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ESIE.DE is Energy Equities. VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while ESIE.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VDPG.L and 0.18% for ESIE.DE.
Find the right allocation for VDPG.L and ESIE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer