VDPG.L vs. DFEN.DE
VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and DFEN.DE (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A) are both exchange-traded funds - VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while DFEN.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VDPG.L returned 24.13%/yr vs 37.80%/yr for DFEN.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDPG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for DFEN.DE.
Performance
VDPG.L vs. DFEN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VDPG.L is traded in GBP, while DFEN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DFEN.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 47.65% return, which is significantly higher than DFEN.DE's 1.94% return.
VDPG.L
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 47.65%
- 6M
- 52.89%
- 1Y
- 80.98%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
DFEN.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 13.44%
- 3Y*
- 37.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDPG.L vs. DFEN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 47.65% | 30.58% | -3.06% | 4.22% |
DFEN.DE VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A | 1.94% | 58.61% | 45.35% | 21.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDPG.L and DFEN.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDPG.L vs. DFEN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VDPG.L
DFEN.DE
VDPG.L vs. DFEN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDPG.L | DFEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.12 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.87 | 0.81 | +5.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.42 | 1.96 | +18.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDPG.L vs. DFEN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.69%, which is greater than DFEN.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and DFEN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDPG.L | DFEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.69% | -19.25% | -21.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -19.25% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.18% | -19.25% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | -16.45% | +11.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -3.22% | -8.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 8.00% | -4.13% |
Volatility
VDPG.L vs. DFEN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) at 7.38%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFEN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDPG.L | DFEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.04% | 7.38% | +3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 18.74% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 24.49% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 20.81% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 20.81% | +2.46% |
VDPG.L vs. DFEN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDPG.L vs. DFEN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither VDPG.L nor DFEN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VDPG.L and DFEN.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFEN.DE.
VDPG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DFEN.DE is Aerospace & Defense. VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while DFEN.DE tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VDPG.L and 0.55% for DFEN.DE.
Find the right allocation for VDPG.L and DFEN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer