PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDPG.L vs. CEMR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDPG.L vs. CEMR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VDPG.L is traded in GBP, while CEMR.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CEMR.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 47.65% return, which is significantly higher than CEMR.DE's 7.96% return.


VDPG.L

1D
4.17%
1M
2.70%
YTD
47.65%
6M
52.89%
1Y
80.98%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*

CEMR.DE

1D
1.90%
1M
3.10%
YTD
7.96%
6M
10.51%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
13.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDPG.L vs. CEMR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VDPG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc
47.65%30.58%-3.06%4.10%-1.89%1.95%15.56%-19.58%
CEMR.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
7.96%33.87%14.79%10.51%-10.68%13.51%17.10%4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VDPG.L and CEMR.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.59

The correlation between VDPG.L and CEMR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDPG.L vs. CEMR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDPG.L
VDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMR.DE
CEMR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CEMR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDPG.L vs. CEMR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VDPG.LCEMR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.25

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.87

1.82

+4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.42

6.71

+13.71

VDPG.L vs. CEMR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the CEMR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDPG.L and CEMR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDPG.L vs. CEMR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.69%, which is greater than CEMR.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and CEMR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDPG.LCEMR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.69%

-24.16%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-12.37%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.18%

-13.31%

-12.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-21.45%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.74%

-0.76%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-5.10%

-6.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

3.36%

+0.51%

Volatility

VDPG.L vs. CEMR.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) at 4.60%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDPG.LCEMR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.04%

4.60%

+6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.69%

14.56%

+5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.82%

16.96%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

16.18%

+5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.27%

16.38%

+6.89%

VDPG.L vs. CEMR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMR.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDPG.L vs. CEMR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VDPG.L nor CEMR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VDPG.L and CEMR.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMR.DE.

VDPG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CEMR.DE is Momentum. VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while CEMR.DE tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VDPG.L and 0.25% for CEMR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDPG.L and CEMR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer