PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VDPG.L is traded in GBP, while 3KOR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3KOR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 35.40% return, which is significantly lower than 3KOR.L's 124.48% return.


VDPG.L

1D
-2.45%
1M
-10.88%
6M
28.76%
YTD
35.40%
1Y
56.81%
3Y*
21.54%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*

3KOR.L

1D
-11.21%
1M
-56.43%
6M
66.70%
YTD
124.48%
1Y
375.45%
3Y*
49.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VDPG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc
35.40%30.58%-3.06%4.10%-3.05%
3KOR.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities
124.48%324.15%-61.68%9.27%-54.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VDPG.L and 3KOR.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2022

0.83

The correlation between VDPG.L and 3KOR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDPG.L
3KOR.L

Technology

39.9%
63.4%

Financial Services

21.4%
7.4%

Industrials

10.4%
15.2%

Basic Materials

8.9%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
5.5%

Real Estate

4.2%

-

Healthcare

2.6%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
1.3%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.1%

Energy

1.8%
0.9%

Utilities

1.6%
0.3%

Technology

VDPG.L
39.9%
3KOR.L
63.4%

Financial Services

VDPG.L
21.4%
3KOR.L
7.4%

Industrials

VDPG.L
10.4%
3KOR.L
15.2%

Basic Materials

VDPG.L
8.9%
3KOR.L
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VDPG.L
5.2%
3KOR.L
5.5%

Real Estate

VDPG.L
4.2%
3KOR.L

-

Healthcare

VDPG.L
2.6%
3KOR.L
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

VDPG.L
2.1%
3KOR.L
1.3%

Communication Services

VDPG.L
2.0%
3KOR.L
2.1%

Energy

VDPG.L
1.8%
3KOR.L
0.9%

Utilities

VDPG.L
1.6%
3KOR.L
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDPG.L
VDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

3KOR.L
3KOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VDPG.L3KOR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

5.76

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

15.71

-3.65

VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the 3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDPG.L and 3KOR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.69%, smaller than the maximum 3KOR.L drawdown of -85.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and 3KOR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDPG.L3KOR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.69%

-85.83%

+45.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.83%

-64.70%

+49.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.18%

-74.96%

+48.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.83%

-64.70%

+49.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-52.67%

+41.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

23.77%

-19.07%

Volatility

VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) is 13.58%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) has a volatility of 61.37%. This indicates that VDPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3KOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDPG.L3KOR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.58%

61.37%

-47.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.94%

119.63%

-95.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.45%

128.33%

-102.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.09%

86.79%

-64.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.70%

86.79%

-63.09%

VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 3KOR.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

VDPG.L vs. 3KOR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VDPG.L nor 3KOR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VDPG.L and 3KOR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3KOR.L.

VDPG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while 3KOR.L is South Korea Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VDPG.L and 0.75% for 3KOR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDPG.L and 3KOR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer