VDIG vs. VT
VDIG (Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDIG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. VDIG is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VDIG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
VDIG vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDIG achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 9.20% return.
VDIG
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
VDIG vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VDIG Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF | -0.22% | 3.68% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 9.20% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDIG and VT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDIG vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
VDIG
VT
VDIG vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF (VDIG) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDIG | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.43 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
VDIG vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDIG drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDIG and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDIG | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -50.27% | +39.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -3.56% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -7.02% | +4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.18% | — |
Volatility
VDIG vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDIG | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.34% | 13.09% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 16.10% | -4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 17.26% | -5.92% |
VDIG vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDIG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDIG vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
VDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than VT's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDIG Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDIG and VT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for VDIG.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.13% for VDIG.
VDIG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VT is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for VDIG and 0.06% for VT.
Find the right allocation for VDIG and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer