VDE vs. PWRZ
VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. VDE is passively managed, while PWRZ is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VDE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRZ.
Performance
VDE vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VDE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 19.26%
- YTD
- 28.19%
- 1Y
- 34.58%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.66%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDE vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.98% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDE and PWRZ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDE vs. PWRZ — Risk / Return Rank
VDE
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VDE vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDE | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDE vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDE drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDE and PWRZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDE | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.20% | -0.40% | -73.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -0.28% | -9.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -0.23% | -19.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | — | — |
Volatility
VDE vs. PWRZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDE | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.89% | 11.81% | +9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 11.81% | +14.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.91% | 11.81% | +18.10% |
VDE vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDE vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison
VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.53% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDE and PWRZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDE and 0.75% for PWRZ.
Find the right allocation for VDE and PWRZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer