PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDE vs. PJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDE vs. PJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDE achieves a 35.27% return, which is significantly higher than PJP's 15.78% return. Over the past 10 years, VDE has outperformed PJP with an annualized return of 9.81%, while PJP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.06% annualized return.


VDE

1D
0.04%
1M
10.29%
6M
22.82%
YTD
35.27%
1Y
41.64%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
24.05%
10Y*
9.81%
ALL TIME*
8.35%

PJP

1D
0.14%
1M
4.06%
6M
15.29%
YTD
15.78%
1Y
43.85%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
7.06%
ALL TIME*
11.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.91M$6.38M$3.32M
$71.54M$103.66M$111.94M

VDE vs. PJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
35.27%7.11%6.75%0.03%62.89%56.31%-33.02%9.28%-19.95%-2.50%
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
15.78%27.98%9.63%-2.18%-2.16%14.58%11.29%4.64%-1.78%15.30%

Correlation

The correlation between VDE and PJP is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005

0.41

The correlation between VDE and PJP shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VDE vs. PJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDE
PJP

Energy

77.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.4%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Utilities

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

VDE
77.0%
PJP

-

Basic Materials

VDE
0.4%
PJP

-

Industrials

VDE
0.2%
PJP

-

Utilities

VDE
0.1%
PJP

-

Communication Services

VDE

-

PJP

-

Consumer Cyclical

VDE

-

PJP

-

Consumer Defensive

VDE

-

PJP

-

Financial Services

VDE

-

PJP
0.0%

Healthcare

VDE

-

PJP
100.0%

Real Estate

VDE

-

PJP

-

Technology

VDE

-

PJP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDE vs. PJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDE
VDE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PJP
PJP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDE vs. PJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VDEPJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

4.71

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

14.61

-7.27

VDE vs. PJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the PJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDE and PJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDE vs. PJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDE drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than PJP's maximum drawdown of -37.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDE and PJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDEPJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.20%

-37.06%

-37.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.04%

-9.44%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-16.27%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-17.51%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.29%

-33.95%

-35.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-1.53%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-8.80%

-11.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.59%

3.03%

+2.56%

Volatility

VDE vs. PJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) is 5.13%, while Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that VDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDEPJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

6.18%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

13.23%

+3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.76%

16.97%

+3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.14%

16.36%

+9.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.90%

18.38%

+11.52%

VDE vs. PJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PJP's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

VDE vs. PJP - Dividend Comparison

VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than PJP's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.88%0.98%0.97%1.01%0.95%0.81%0.75%0.77%1.12%0.65%0.91%5.49%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
2.39%3.11%3.23%3.34%3.65%4.13%4.76%3.42%3.35%2.90%2.31%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDE and PJP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJP has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to VDE (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDE dropped -74.20% vs PJP's -37.06%.

On 10-year performance, VDE leads with 9.81% vs 7.06% for PJP. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VDE has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.

VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.88% for PJP.

VDE is categorized as Energy Equities, while PJP is Health & Biotech Equities. VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDE and 0.58% for PJP.

PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDE and PJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer