VDE vs. NLR
VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDE returned 9.17%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for NLR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
VDE vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDE achieves a 22.66% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VDE has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 9.17%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.50% annualized return.
VDE
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 32.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 18.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
NLR
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -12.79%
- YTD
- -5.48%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 29.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
VDE vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 22.66% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -5.48% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDE and NLR is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007 | 0.48 |
The correlation between VDE and NLR shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VDE vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDE
NLR
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
VDE
NLR
Basic Materials
VDE
NLR
-
Industrials
VDE
NLR
Communication Services
VDE
-
NLR
-
Consumer Cyclical
VDE
-
NLR
-
Consumer Defensive
VDE
-
NLR
-
Financial Services
VDE
-
NLR
-
Healthcare
VDE
-
NLR
-
Real Estate
VDE
-
NLR
-
Technology
VDE
-
NLR
Utilities
VDE
-
NLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDE vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
VDE
NLR
VDE vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDE | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.08 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 0.37 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 0.77 | +6.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDE vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDE drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDE and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDE | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.20% | -65.05% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.20% | -29.72% | +15.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -30.48% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -30.48% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.29% | -34.35% | -34.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.22% | -28.58% | +15.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.94% | -35.68% | +15.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 14.05% | -9.29% |
Volatility
VDE vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) is 6.96%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.33%. This indicates that VDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDE | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 13.33% | -6.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.74% | 32.82% | -16.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 42.83% | -22.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.38% | 29.66% | -3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 24.27% | +5.66% |
VDE vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDE vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than NLR's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.70% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 3.25% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDE and NLR have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to VDE (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDE dropped -74.20% vs NLR's -65.05%.
On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 12.50% vs 9.17% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 2.70% for NLR.
VDE is categorized as Energy Equities, while NLR is Uranium. VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDE and 0.56% for NLR.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDE and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer