VDE vs. GNR
VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) and GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while GNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDE returned 9.47%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for GNR. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VDE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GNR.
Performance
VDE vs. GNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDE achieves a 31.33% return, which is significantly higher than GNR's 15.95% return. Over the past 10 years, VDE has underperformed GNR with an annualized return of 9.47%, while GNR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.
VDE
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 31.33%
- 6M
- 29.93%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
GNR
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 15.95%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 37.42%
- 3Y*
- 13.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
VDE vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 31.33% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 15.95% | 28.68% | -8.27% | 2.95% | 10.20% | 24.73% | -0.03% | 16.49% | -13.19% | 22.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDE and GNR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VDE and GNR has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VDE vs. GNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDE
GNR
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
VDE
GNR
Basic Materials
VDE
GNR
Industrials
VDE
GNR
Communication Services
VDE
-
GNR
-
Consumer Cyclical
VDE
-
GNR
Consumer Defensive
VDE
-
GNR
Financial Services
VDE
-
GNR
Healthcare
VDE
-
GNR
Real Estate
VDE
-
GNR
Technology
VDE
-
GNR
-
Utilities
VDE
-
GNR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDE vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank
VDE
GNR
VDE vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDE | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 4.72 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 18.00 | -7.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDE | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.23 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.45 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.48 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.25 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
VDE vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDE drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than GNR's maximum drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDE and GNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDE | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.20% | -51.37% | -22.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -7.97% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -21.15% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -25.66% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.29% | -48.59% | -20.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.08% | -5.04% | -2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -14.94% | -5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 2.08% | +2.00% |
Volatility
VDE vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) at 5.49%. This indicates that VDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDE | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 5.49% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 13.73% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.36% | 16.88% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 20.30% | +6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 21.90% | +8.03% |
VDE vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDE vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison
VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than GNR's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 2.56% | 2.76% | 4.73% | 3.37% | 4.37% | 3.44% | 2.78% | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.40% | 2.06% | 4.59% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.39% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDE and GNR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDE has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to GNR (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDE dropped -74.20% vs GNR's -51.37%.
On 10-year performance, GNR leads with 10.53% vs 9.47% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GNR has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GNR.
GNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 2.39% for VDE.
VDE is categorized as Energy Equities, while GNR is Commodity Producers Equities. VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDE and 0.40% for GNR.
GNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDE and GNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer