VDE vs. EFV
VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) and EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDE returned 9.39%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for EFV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VDE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EFV.
Performance
VDE vs. EFV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDE achieves a 29.66% return, which is significantly higher than EFV's 10.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VDE has underperformed EFV with an annualized return of 9.39%, while EFV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.
VDE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 29.66%
- 6M
- 28.33%
- 1Y
- 37.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
EFV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
VDE vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 29.66% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 10.56% | 42.22% | 5.35% | 18.85% | -5.22% | 11.08% | -2.97% | 15.80% | -14.67% | 21.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDE and EFV is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VDE and EFV has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VDE vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDE
EFV
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
VDE
EFV
Basic Materials
VDE
EFV
Industrials
VDE
EFV
Communication Services
VDE
-
EFV
Consumer Cyclical
VDE
-
EFV
Consumer Defensive
VDE
-
EFV
Financial Services
VDE
-
EFV
Healthcare
VDE
-
EFV
Real Estate
VDE
-
EFV
Technology
VDE
-
EFV
Utilities
VDE
-
EFV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDE vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank
VDE
EFV
VDE vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDE | EFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 2.55 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 9.40 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDE vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDE drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than EFV's maximum drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDE and EFV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDE | EFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.20% | -63.94% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -10.90% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -13.72% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -25.84% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.29% | -43.16% | -26.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.26% | -1.24% | -7.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -14.81% | -5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 2.96% | +1.25% |
Volatility
VDE vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a higher volatility of 7.15% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) at 4.62%. This indicates that VDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDE | EFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.15% | 4.62% | +2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.59% | 11.98% | +4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.46% | 14.58% | +5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.45% | 16.02% | +10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 17.85% | +12.08% |
VDE vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EFV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDE vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison
VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than EFV's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 3.76% | 4.16% | 4.66% | 4.36% | 4.17% | 4.07% | 2.42% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.42% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDE and EFV have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDE has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to EFV (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDE dropped -74.20% vs EFV's -63.94%.
On 10-year performance, EFV leads with 10.55% vs 9.39% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFV has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EFV.
EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 2.42% for VDE.
VDE is categorized as Energy Equities, while EFV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDE and 0.31% for EFV.
EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDE and EFV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer