VCV vs. COST
VCV (Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. VCV operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, VCV returned 2.45%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for COST. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VCV vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCV achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VCV has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 2.45%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.34% annualized return.
VCV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 10.49%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
COST
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- -8.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 21.24%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
VCV vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCV Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust | -1.63% | 9.44% | 18.62% | 7.91% | -28.40% | 9.65% | 7.85% | 18.63% | -5.27% | 9.01% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 11.85% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCV and COST is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1994 | 0.08 |
The correlation between VCV and COST shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VCV:
$0.62
COST:
$26.51
VCV:
17.10
COST:
36.29
VCV:
0.09
COST:
2.84
VCV:
7.88
COST:
1.09
VCV:
$64.85M
COST:
$293.59B
VCV:
$46.46M
COST:
$11.12B
VCV:
$58.08M
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCV vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
VCV
COST
VCV vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust (VCV) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCV | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.94 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | -0.44 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.09 | -0.88 | +3.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCV | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | -0.44 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.94 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 1.02 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.59 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
VCV vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCV drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCV and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCV | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -53.39% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -18.95% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.99% | -20.74% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.55% | -31.40% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.55% | -31.40% | -7.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -12.11% | +7.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -13.36% | +4.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 9.86% | -6.46% |
Volatility
VCV vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust (VCV) is 1.85%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 8.05%. This indicates that VCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCV | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.85% | 8.05% | -6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.22% | 14.83% | -7.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 19.12% | -8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 22.73% | -9.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 21.95% | -8.15% |
Dividends
VCV vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
VCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than COST's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.56% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
VCV Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust | 7.29% | 6.96% | 5.76% | 4.16% | 5.46% | 4.09% | 4.07% | 4.43% | 5.46% | 5.10% | 5.86% | 5.98% |
Financials
VCV vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
VCV and COST have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COST has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to VCV (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCV dropped -59.02% vs COST's -53.39%.
VCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCV and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer