VCULX vs. VDAFX
Compare and contrast key facts about VALIC Company I Growth Fund (VCULX) and VALIC Company I Dynamic Allocation Fund (VDAFX).
VCULX is managed by VALIC. It was launched on Dec 5, 2005. VDAFX is managed by VALIC. It was launched on Dec 18, 2012.
Performance
VCULX vs. VDAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VCULX vs. VDAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCULX VALIC Company I Growth Fund | -9.19% | 10.84% | 32.74% | 46.14% | -35.17% | 20.88% | 42.64% | 31.75% | -6.16% | 30.29% |
VDAFX VALIC Company I Dynamic Allocation Fund | -2.90% | 7.87% | 12.77% | 13.23% | -16.05% | 10.25% | 11.15% | 20.27% | -10.50% | 20.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCULX achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly lower than VDAFX's -2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VCULX has outperformed VDAFX with an annualized return of 13.94%, while VDAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.36% annualized return.
VCULX
- 1D
- 3.99%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -10.03%
- 1Y
- 15.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.94%
VDAFX
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 6M
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- 9.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.85%
- 10Y*
- 6.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VCULX vs. VDAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCULX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VDAFX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VCULX vs. VDAFX — Risk / Return Rank
VCULX
VDAFX
VCULX vs. VDAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Growth Fund (VCULX) and VALIC Company I Dynamic Allocation Fund (VDAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCULX | VDAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 1.03 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.52 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 1.37 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | 5.61 | -2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCULX | VDAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.03 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.41 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.59 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.50 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between VCULX and VDAFX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VCULX vs. VDAFX - Dividend Comparison
VCULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.96%, more than VDAFX's 5.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCULX VALIC Company I Growth Fund | 12.96% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 30.05% | 37.81% | 12.80% | 7.28% | 7.63% | 0.63% | 6.70% |
VDAFX VALIC Company I Dynamic Allocation Fund | 5.43% | 0.00% | 5.99% | 7.99% | 16.76% | 11.16% | 5.50% | 6.88% | 1.43% | 2.28% |
Drawdowns
VCULX vs. VDAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCULX drawdown since its inception was -51.32%, which is greater than VDAFX's maximum drawdown of -22.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCULX and VDAFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCULX | VDAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.32% | -22.10% | -29.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.39% | -6.30% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.13% | -20.52% | -18.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.13% | -22.10% | -17.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -4.25% | -8.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -6.00% | -4.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 1.54% | +3.17% |
Volatility
VCULX vs. VDAFX - Volatility Comparison
VALIC Company I Growth Fund (VCULX) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to VALIC Company I Dynamic Allocation Fund (VDAFX) at 3.18%. This indicates that VCULX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VCULX | VDAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 3.18% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 5.59% | +7.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.87% | 9.34% | +13.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 9.55% | +13.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 10.86% | +11.09% |