PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCSH vs. FLRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VCSH vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VCSH vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.13%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%7.02%0.92%2.17%
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
0.84%5.01%6.32%6.54%1.31%0.39%0.77%4.02%1.39%1.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCSH achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, VCSH has underperformed FLRN with an annualized return of 2.72%, while FLRN has yielded a comparatively higher 2.99% annualized return.


VCSH

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
0.13%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
2.72%

FLRN

1D
0.16%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.99%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.88%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VCSH vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCSH has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

VCSH vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRN
FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCSH vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCSHFLRNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

2.58

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

3.22

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

2.10

-0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

3.21

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.44

26.30

-11.87

VCSH vs. FLRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FLRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCSH and FLRN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCSHFLRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.58

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

2.39

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.71

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.49

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between VCSH and FLRN is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

VCSH vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

VCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than FLRN's 4.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.41%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
4.69%4.89%5.67%5.68%1.95%0.39%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.64%1.06%0.63%

Drawdowns

VCSH vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCSH drawdown since its inception was -12.86%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCSH and FLRN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VCSHFLRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-14.64%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-1.43%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.48%

-2.16%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

-14.64%

+1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

0.00%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-1.85%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.17%

+0.17%

Volatility

VCSH vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.37%. This indicates that VCSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VCSHFLRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.37%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.29%

0.54%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28%

1.82%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.86%

1.69%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

4.21%

-0.86%