VCRM vs. BNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX).
VCRM and BNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VCRM is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P Broad AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 21, 2024. BNDX is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). It was launched on May 31, 2013. Both VCRM and BNDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VCRM vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VCRM vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.34% | 4.91% | -0.58% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 0.02% | 2.86% | 0.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCRM achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 0.02% return.
VCRM
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 2.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VCRM vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCRM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VCRM vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank
VCRM
BNDX
VCRM vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCRM | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.85 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.19 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.01 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 4.10 | +0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCRM | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.85 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.61 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between VCRM and BNDX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VCRM vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison
VCRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than BNDX's 4.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.59% | 3.42% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
VCRM vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCRM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum BNDX drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRM and BNDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCRM | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -16.23% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.22% | -2.93% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -1.99% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -3.10% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 0.72% | +0.41% |
Volatility
VCRM vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) is 1.49%, while Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that VCRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VCRM | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 1.74% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.07% | 2.29% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 3.21% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 4.81% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 4.05% | -0.05% |