VCR vs. GXPD
VCR (Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF) and GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - VCR tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index while GXPD tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VCR charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPD.
Performance
VCR vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VCR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 11.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.55%
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCR vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.01% | 4.43% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -0.00% | 5.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCR and GXPD is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCR vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank
VCR
GXPD
VCR vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCR | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCR | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.32 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
VCR vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and GXPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCR | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.54% | -16.61% | -44.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -4.65% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -4.26% | -5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | — | — |
Volatility
VCR vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCR | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 20.03% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 20.03% | +3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 20.03% | +2.38% |
VCR vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VCR vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison
VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than GXPD's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VCR and GXPD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPD.
VCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.
VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCR and 0.15% for GXPD.
Find the right allocation for VCR and GXPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer