VCR vs. FSRPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX).
VCR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. FSRPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985.
Performance
VCR vs. FSRPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VCR vs. FSRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | -7.95% | 5.77% | 24.27% | 40.38% | -35.15% | 24.86% | 48.36% | 27.45% | -2.31% | 22.82% |
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | -2.40% | -4.15% | 23.28% | 26.94% | -29.44% | 18.25% | 44.27% | 26.33% | 4.58% | 25.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a -7.95% return, which is significantly lower than FSRPX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has outperformed FSRPX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while FSRPX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.76% annualized return.
VCR
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- -7.95%
- 6M
- -8.86%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.88%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
FSRPX
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -11.98%
- 1Y
- 1.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VCR vs. FSRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRPX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VCR vs. FSRPX — Risk / Return Rank
VCR
FSRPX
VCR vs. FSRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCR | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 0.09 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 0.28 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.04 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.02 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | -0.06 | +2.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCR | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.09 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.10 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.55 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.64 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between VCR and FSRPX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VCR vs. FSRPX - Dividend Comparison
VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than FSRPX's 8.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% |
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 8.97% | 8.75% | 12.41% | 7.40% | 2.90% | 15.92% | 6.82% | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.37% | 0.14% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
VCR vs. FSRPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, which is greater than FSRPX's maximum drawdown of -55.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and FSRPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCR | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.54% | -55.75% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -17.79% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.20% | -39.01% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.20% | -39.01% | -0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.14% | -15.22% | +3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -9.09% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 6.49% | -1.71% |
Volatility
VCR vs. FSRPX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) at 5.80%. This indicates that VCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VCR | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 5.80% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 16.54% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.28% | 23.53% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.94% | 22.71% | +1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 21.57% | +0.76% |