PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCPA.L vs. XMBR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCPA.L vs. XMBR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VCPA.L is traded in GBP, while XMBR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMBR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCPA.L achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than XMBR.L's 12.22% return.


VCPA.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.02%
6M
-0.37%
YTD
0.02%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*

XMBR.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.59%
6M
7.74%
YTD
12.22%
1Y
34.03%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCPA.L vs. XMBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VCPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.02%0.42%4.58%2.12%-4.89%0.33%5.37%-15.43%
XMBR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C
12.22%38.26%-28.61%25.42%25.85%-17.12%-21.96%7.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VCPA.L and XMBR.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019

0.05

The correlation between VCPA.L and XMBR.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCPA.L vs. XMBR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCPA.L
VCPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

XMBR.L
XMBR.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XMBR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMBR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMBR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XMBR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMBR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCPA.L vs. XMBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCPA.LXMBR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.28

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

1.89

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

4.95

-2.86

VCPA.L vs. XMBR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the XMBR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCPA.L and XMBR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCPA.L vs. XMBR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCPA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.70%, smaller than the maximum XMBR.L drawdown of -84.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCPA.L and XMBR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCPA.LXMBR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.70%

-84.29%

+59.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.67%

-17.94%

+13.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-40.25%

+20.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.09%

-40.25%

+20.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.56%

-42.35%

+29.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.95%

-57.95%

+44.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

6.85%

-4.87%

Volatility

VCPA.L vs. XMBR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) is 1.56%, while Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that VCPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCPA.LXMBR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

4.47%

-2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.51%

16.23%

-11.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

21.31%

-15.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

29.35%

-12.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

32.63%

-15.46%

VCPA.L vs. XMBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCPA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XMBR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCPA.L vs. XMBR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VCPA.L nor XMBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VCPA.L and XMBR.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VCPA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCPA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMBR.L.

VCPA.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XMBR.L is Latin America Equities. VCPA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while XMBR.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VCPA.L and 0.65% for XMBR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCPA.L and XMBR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer