VCPA.L vs. SDIA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L).
VCPA.L and SDIA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VCPA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. It was launched on Feb 19, 2019. SDIA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. It was launched on Apr 13, 2017. Both VCPA.L and SDIA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VCPA.L vs. SDIA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VCPA.L vs. SDIA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCPA.L Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.56% | -99.00% | 4.58% | 2.13% | -4.89% | -0.13% | 5.86% | 10.80% |
SDIA.L iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.73% | -1.40% | 6.83% | 0.36% | 6.87% | 0.24% | 1.43% | 3.82% |
Different Trading Currencies
VCPA.L is traded in GBP, while SDIA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SDIA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCPA.L achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than SDIA.L's 1.98% return.
VCPA.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -98.98%
- 3Y*
- -77.92%
- 5Y*
- -59.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SDIA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 2.00%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VCPA.L vs. SDIA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCPA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SDIA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VCPA.L vs. SDIA.L — Risk / Return Rank
VCPA.L
SDIA.L
VCPA.L vs. SDIA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCPA.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | 0.29 | -1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | 0.45 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.32 | 1.05 | -0.74 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 0.50 | -1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 0.98 | -2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCPA.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 | 0.29 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.32 | 0.40 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.24 | 0.29 | -1.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between VCPA.L and SDIA.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VCPA.L vs. SDIA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VCPA.L nor SDIA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
VCPA.L vs. SDIA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCPA.L drawdown since its inception was -99.06%, which is greater than SDIA.L's maximum drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCPA.L and SDIA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCPA.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.06% | -12.55% | -86.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.02% | -1.32% | -97.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.04% | -7.61% | -91.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.03% | -0.68% | -98.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -1.19% | -14.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.14% | 0.28% | +70.86% |
Volatility
VCPA.L vs. SDIA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) is 1.90%, while iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that VCPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDIA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VCPA.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.90% | 2.55% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.45% | 4.80% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.71% | 7.00% | +91.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.56% | 8.13% | +37.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.18% | 8.45% | +32.73% |