PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCPA.L vs. SHYU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCPA.L vs. SHYU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCPA.L achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than SHYU.L's -1.70% return.


VCPA.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.41%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.27%
1Y
-98.93%
3Y*
-77.87%
5Y*
-59.47%
10Y*

SHYU.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-1.85%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
2.26%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCPA.L vs. SHYU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VCPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.51%-99.00%4.58%2.13%-4.89%-0.13%5.86%10.80%
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-1.70%-4.17%8.56%4.72%2.04%4.96%1.60%6.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VCPA.L and SHYU.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2019

0.66

The correlation between VCPA.L and SHYU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCPA.L vs. SHYU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCPA.L
VCPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SHYU.L
SHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCPA.L vs. SHYU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCPA.LSHYU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.31

1.05

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

0.25

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

0.43

-1.64

VCPA.L vs. SHYU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCPA.L and SHYU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCPA.LSHYU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

0.24

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-1.32

0.39

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.24

0.59

-1.83

Drawdowns

VCPA.L vs. SHYU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCPA.L drawdown since its inception was -99.06%, which is greater than SHYU.L's maximum drawdown of -15.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCPA.L and SHYU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCPA.LSHYU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.06%

-15.01%

-84.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.02%

-6.61%

-92.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.04%

-11.08%

-87.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.04%

-11.08%

-87.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.03%

-9.14%

-89.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.55%

-4.14%

-13.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

81.78%

3.83%

+77.95%

Volatility

VCPA.L vs. SHYU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) is 1.53%, while iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that VCPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHYU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCPA.LSHYU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

1.72%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

4.34%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.63%

6.89%

+91.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.54%

8.13%

+37.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.64%

9.74%

+30.90%

VCPA.L vs. SHYU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCPA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SHYU.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCPA.L vs. SHYU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VCPA.L nor SHYU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%6.32%5.76%4.82%4.27%5.16%5.58%5.52%5.74%5.16%5.87%
VCPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCPA.L and SHYU.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VCPA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCPA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYU.L.

VCPA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while SHYU.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VCPA.L and 0.50% for SHYU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCPA.L and SHYU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer