SHYU.L vs. AGGU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L).
SHYU.L and AGGU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHYU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011. AGGU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 21, 2017. Both SHYU.L and AGGU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SHYU.L or AGGU.L.
Key characteristics
| SHYU.L | AGGU.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.29% | 2.85% |
| 1Y Return | 7.50% | 9.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.38% | -0.92% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.52% | 0.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.00 | 2.13 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.50 | 3.39 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.24 | 0.73 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.02 | 11.48 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.31% | 0.84% |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.99% | 4.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.01% | -15.55% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.30% | -4.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHYU.L and AGGU.L is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SHYU.L vs. AGGU.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SHYU.L achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly higher than AGGU.L's 2.85% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHYU.L vs. AGGU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHYU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGU.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SHYU.L vs. AGGU.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SHYU.L vs. AGGU.L - Dividend Comparison
SHYU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, while AGGU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHYU.L iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 6.11% | 5.76% | 4.82% | 4.27% | 5.16% | 5.58% | 5.52% | 5.74% | 5.16% | 5.87% | 5.56% | 6.09% |
AGGU.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SHYU.L vs. AGGU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHYU.L drawdown since its inception was -15.01%, roughly equal to the maximum AGGU.L drawdown of -15.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYU.L and AGGU.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SHYU.L vs. AGGU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) have volatilities of 1.10% and 1.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.