VCOB vs. DFUV

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

VCOB (Voya Core Bond ETF) and DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCOB is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Voya, while DFUV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VCOB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for DFUV.

Performance

VCOB vs. DFUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Core Bond ETF (VCOB) and Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCOB achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than DFUV's 18.93% return.

VCOB

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.76%
• 6M: -2.50%
• YTD: -2.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DFUV

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 13.57%
• YTD: 18.93%
• 1Y: 29.13%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	$24.58M	$21.35M	$22.47M
VCOB Voya Core Bond ETF	$300.60K	$226.80K	$472.29K

VCOB vs. DFUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VCOB Voya Core Bond ETF	-2.21%	0.35%
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	18.93%	5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VCOB and DFUV is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

VCOB vs. DFUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VCOB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DFUV

DFUV Risk / Return Rank: 93
DFUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
DFUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DFUV Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DFUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
DFUV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VCOB vs. DFUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Core Bond ETF (VCOB) and Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VCOB	DFUV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.87	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.14	—

Drawdowns

VCOB vs. DFUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCOB drawdown since its inception was -3.53%, smaller than the maximum DFUV drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCOB and DFUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VCOB	DFUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-17.60%	+14.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.01%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-1.40%	-2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-3.54%	+2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VCOB	DFUV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82%	12.04%	-8.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.82%	16.13%	-12.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.82%	16.13%	-12.31%

VCOB vs. DFUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCOB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUV's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VCOB vs. DFUV - Dividend Comparison

VCOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than DFUV's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	1.31%	1.55%	1.64%	1.72%	1.34%
VCOB Voya Core Bond ETF	0.50%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VCOB and DFUV in my portfolio?

VCOB and DFUV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VCOB or DFUV?

On fees, DFUV is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VCOB or DFUV?

DFUV is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VCOB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VCOB or DFUV?

DFUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.50% for VCOB.

What is the main difference between VCOB and DFUV?

VCOB is categorized as Actively Managed, while DFUV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Voya and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VCOB and 0.21% for DFUV.