VCIT vs. VPLS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) and VPLS (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCIT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index, while VPLS is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard. VCIT is passively managed, while VPLS is actively managed. Over the past year, VCIT returned 6.13% vs 5.91% for VPLS. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VCIT charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for VPLS.

Performance

VCIT vs. VPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than VPLS's 0.64% return.

VCIT

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: 6.00%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

VPLS

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 0.57%
• 1Y: 5.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCIT vs. VPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF	0.18%	9.34%	3.20%	2.83%
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF	0.64%	7.86%	2.72%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VCIT and VPLS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023	0.95

The correlation between VCIT and VPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VCIT vs. VPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCIT

VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 42
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

VPLS

VPLS Risk / Return Rank: 45
VPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
VPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
VPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
VPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
VPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCIT vs. VPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VCIT	VPLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.63	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.42	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	2.18	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.95	7.10	-0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VCIT vs. VPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the VPLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCIT and VPLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VCIT	VPLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	1.63	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	1.24	-0.48

Drawdowns

VCIT vs. VPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, which is greater than VPLS's maximum drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and VPLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VCIT	VPLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.56%	-4.17%	-16.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.96%	-2.72%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-1.21%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-1.01%	-2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.83%	+0.05%

Volatility

VCIT vs. VPLS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) at 1.27%. This indicates that VCIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VCIT	VPLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.38%	1.27%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.06%	2.69%	+0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.10%	3.65%	+0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.61%	4.61%	+2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.28%	4.61%	+1.67%

VCIT vs. VPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCIT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VPLS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VCIT vs. VPLS - Dividend Comparison

VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, which matches VPLS's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF	4.80%	4.62%	4.43%	3.72%	3.03%	2.87%	2.78%	3.37%	3.61%	3.21%	3.29%	3.34%
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF	4.76%	4.78%	4.52%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VCIT and VPLS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, VCIT and VPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VCIT or VPLS?

VCIT has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to VPLS (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCIT dropped -20.56% vs VPLS's -4.17%.

Which ETF is better, VCIT or VPLS?

On 1-year performance, VCIT leads with 6.13% vs 5.91% for VPLS. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VPLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VCIT or VPLS?

Over the 1-year period, VCIT has performed better with a 6.13% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VCIT or VPLS?

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VPLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VCIT or VPLS?

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.76% for VPLS.

What is the main difference between VCIT and VPLS?

VCIT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VPLS is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VCIT and 0.20% for VPLS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.