PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCIT vs. VFSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCIT vs. VFSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares (VFSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than VFSTX's 0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, VCIT has outperformed VFSTX with an annualized return of 2.93%, while VFSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.54% annualized return.


VCIT

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.07%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
2.93%

VFSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
2.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCIT vs. VFSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.18%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%14.10%-1.74%5.31%
VFSTX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares
0.77%6.75%4.98%6.06%-5.84%-0.70%5.16%5.75%0.87%2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VCIT and VFSTX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.72

The correlation between VCIT and VFSTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCIT vs. VFSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VFSTX
VFSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VFSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VFSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCIT vs. VFSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares (VFSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCITVFSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

2.04

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

3.61

-1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.46

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.76

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.95

10.82

-3.87

VCIT vs. VFSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the VFSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCIT and VFSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCITVFSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.04

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.78

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

1.03

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.51

-0.76

Drawdowns

VCIT vs. VFSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, which is greater than VFSTX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and VFSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCITVFSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-9.35%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-1.71%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-1.71%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

-9.35%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

-9.35%

-11.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-0.26%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-1.12%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.43%

+0.45%

Volatility

VCIT vs. VFSTX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares (VFSTX) at 0.74%. This indicates that VCIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCITVFSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

0.74%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

1.65%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

2.31%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

2.98%

+3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

2.48%

+3.80%

VCIT vs. VFSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCIT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VFSTX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCIT vs. VFSTX - Dividend Comparison

VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than VFSTX's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.80%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%
VFSTX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares
4.61%4.48%4.06%3.05%1.93%1.70%2.24%2.83%2.68%2.00%2.04%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCIT and VFSTX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCIT has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to VFSTX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCIT dropped -20.56% vs VFSTX's -9.35%.

VFSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCIT and VFSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer