PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCIT vs. SCHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCIT vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHO's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VCIT has outperformed SCHO with an annualized return of 2.93%, while SCHO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.71% annualized return.


VCIT

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.96%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.89%
1Y
6.00%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
2.93%

SCHO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
1.82%
10Y*
1.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCIT vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.41%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%14.10%-1.74%5.31%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.54%5.49%3.65%4.31%-3.87%-0.64%3.11%3.47%1.37%0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between VCIT and SCHO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010

0.64

The correlation between VCIT and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.76 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCIT vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCIT vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCITSCHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.50

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.91

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.07

16.48

-10.41

VCIT vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the SCHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCIT and SCHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCIT vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and SCHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCITSCHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-5.69%

-14.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-0.86%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-0.98%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

-5.69%

-14.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

-5.69%

-14.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.14%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-0.61%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.20%

+0.72%

Volatility

VCIT vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.43%. This indicates that VCIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCITSCHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

0.43%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

0.93%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

1.37%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

1.98%

+4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

1.56%

+4.72%

VCIT vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VCIT and SCHO have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCIT vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than SCHO's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.90%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.79%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCIT and SCHO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCIT has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to SCHO (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCIT dropped -20.56% vs SCHO's -5.69%.

On 10-year performance, VCIT leads with 2.93% vs 1.71% for SCHO. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCIT has performed better with a 2.93% return vs 1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT and SCHO have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.90% for SCHO.

VCIT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHO is Government Bonds. VCIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.

SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCIT and SCHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer