PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCIT vs. JCPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCIT vs. JCPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than JCPI's 1.34% return.


VCIT

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
2.93%

JCPI

1D
-0.00%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.12%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCIT vs. JCPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.41%9.34%3.20%8.98%-5.46%
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
1.34%7.10%4.70%5.04%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between VCIT and JCPI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022

0.72

The correlation between VCIT and JCPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCIT vs. JCPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

JCPI
JCPI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
JCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCIT vs. JCPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCITJCPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.05

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.07

10.17

-4.10

VCIT vs. JCPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the JCPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCIT and JCPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCIT vs. JCPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, which is greater than JCPI's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and JCPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCITJCPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-7.85%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-1.60%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-2.81%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.74%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-1.86%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.48%

+0.44%

Volatility

VCIT vs. JCPI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) at 0.90%. This indicates that VCIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JCPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCITJCPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

0.90%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

2.06%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

2.91%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

4.49%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

4.49%

+1.79%

VCIT vs. JCPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCIT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JCPI's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCIT vs. JCPI - Dividend Comparison

VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than JCPI's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
3.95%3.93%3.98%3.45%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.79%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCIT and JCPI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCIT has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to JCPI (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCIT dropped -20.56% vs JCPI's -7.85%.

On 3-year performance, VCIT leads with 6.37% vs 5.40% for JCPI. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JCPI has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VCIT has performed better with a 6.37% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JCPI.

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.95% for JCPI.

VCIT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JCPI is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VCIT and 0.25% for JCPI.

JCPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCIT and JCPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer