PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCDAX vs. PRHSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCDAX vs. PRHSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund Admiral Shares (VCDAX) and T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCDAX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than PRHSX's -3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, VCDAX has outperformed PRHSX with an annualized return of 13.70%, while PRHSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.


VCDAX

1D
-1.75%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.40%
6M
1.34%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
13.70%

PRHSX

1D
-1.75%
1M
2.20%
YTD
-3.09%
6M
-2.56%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
3.12%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCDAX vs. PRHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCDAX
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.40%5.66%24.37%40.40%-35.17%26.20%48.18%27.55%-2.26%22.83%
PRHSX
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
-3.09%17.75%1.82%3.03%-12.22%13.50%30.19%37.88%1.08%28.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VCDAX and PRHSX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2004

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between VCDAX and PRHSX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCDAX vs. PRHSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCDAX
VCDAX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VCDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
VCDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PRHSX
PRHSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PRHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCDAX vs. PRHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund Admiral Shares (VCDAX) and T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCDAXPRHSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.46

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

2.17

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.25

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

1.70

-0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.24

4.93

-2.70

VCDAX vs. PRHSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCDAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the PRHSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCDAX and PRHSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCDAXPRHSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.46

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.18

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.53

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.62

-0.11

Drawdowns

VCDAX vs. PRHSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCDAX drawdown since its inception was -61.66%, which is greater than PRHSX's maximum drawdown of -42.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCDAX and PRHSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCDAXPRHSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.66%

-42.96%

-18.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-12.81%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.44%

-21.00%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.51%

-27.61%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

-28.97%

-9.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-6.13%

+1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-8.75%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

4.41%

+0.55%

Volatility

VCDAX vs. PRHSX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund Admiral Shares (VCDAX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) at 4.35%. This indicates that VCDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCDAXPRHSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

4.35%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

11.77%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.45%

15.31%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.00%

17.22%

+6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

19.25%

+3.25%

VCDAX vs. PRHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCDAX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PRHSX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCDAX vs. PRHSX - Dividend Comparison

VCDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than PRHSX's 12.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRHSX
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
12.48%12.09%12.89%5.21%1.77%7.46%7.16%12.29%6.57%7.43%4.55%11.34%
VCDAX
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.72%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%1.82%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCDAX and PRHSX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCDAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to PRHSX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCDAX dropped -61.66% vs PRHSX's -42.96%.

PRHSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCDAX and PRHSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer