Correlation
The correlation between PRHSX and FSMEX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
PRHSX vs. FSMEX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX).
PRHSX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 29, 1995. FSMEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 28, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PRHSX or FSMEX.
Performance
PRHSX vs. FSMEX - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
PRHSX:
-0.47
FSMEX:
0.24
PRHSX:
-0.58
FSMEX:
0.36
PRHSX:
0.93
FSMEX:
1.05
PRHSX:
-0.44
FSMEX:
0.11
PRHSX:
-0.98
FSMEX:
0.53
PRHSX:
9.32%
FSMEX:
5.79%
PRHSX:
18.27%
FSMEX:
19.72%
PRHSX:
-42.96%
FSMEX:
-40.34%
PRHSX:
-18.44%
FSMEX:
-20.97%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRHSX achieves a -6.61% return, which is significantly lower than FSMEX's -1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PRHSX has underperformed FSMEX with an annualized return of 6.14%, while FSMEX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.
PRHSX
-6.61%
-6.50%
-13.73%
-8.50%
1.26%
3.67%
6.14%
FSMEX
-1.63%
1.35%
-5.18%
4.66%
3.36%
5.13%
10.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRHSX vs. FSMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRHSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMEX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PRHSX vs. FSMEX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PRHSX
FSMEX
PRHSX vs. FSMEX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
PRHSX vs. FSMEX - Dividend Comparison
PRHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.80%, more than FSMEX's 10.64% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRHSX T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund | 13.80% | 12.89% | 5.21% | 1.77% | 7.46% | 7.16% | 6.18% | 6.57% | 7.43% | 4.55% | 11.34% | 11.91% |
FSMEX Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio | 10.64% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 1.80% | 8.12% | 6.65% | 1.77% | 7.47% | 6.26% | 5.84% | 16.35% | 15.54% |
Drawdowns
PRHSX vs. FSMEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRHSX drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, which is greater than FSMEX's maximum drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRHSX and FSMEX.
Loading data...
Volatility
PRHSX vs. FSMEX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) at 5.55%. This indicates that PRHSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...