PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRHSX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRHSX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRHSX achieves a -1.52% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PRHSX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.77%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


PRHSX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.83%
YTD
-1.52%
6M
-2.57%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
2.61%
10Y*
10.77%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRHSX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRHSX
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
-1.52%17.75%1.82%3.03%-12.22%13.50%30.19%37.88%1.08%28.04%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PRHSX and VOO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between PRHSX and VOO has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRHSX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRHSX
PRHSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PRHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PRHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRHSX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRHSXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

3.02

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.74

13.58

-8.84

PRHSX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRHSX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRHSX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRHSX drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRHSX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRHSXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.96%

-33.99%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.81%

-8.90%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

-18.69%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.61%

-24.52%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.97%

-33.99%

+5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.61%

-1.74%

-2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-3.68%

-5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

1.98%

+2.57%

Volatility

PRHSX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that PRHSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRHSXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

4.60%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

9.73%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

12.39%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

16.90%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

18.05%

+1.22%

PRHSX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRHSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRHSX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PRHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.28%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRHSX
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
12.28%12.09%12.89%5.21%1.77%7.46%7.16%12.29%6.57%7.43%4.55%11.34%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRHSX and VOO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRHSX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRHSX dropped -42.96% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRHSX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer