PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCAR vs. CTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VCAR vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VCAR vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VCAR
Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF
-22.35%-14.73%152.27%58.33%-49.45%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
12.39%0.88%24.15%-2.23%9.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCAR achieves a -22.35% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 12.39% return.


VCAR

1D
4.57%
1M
-10.10%
YTD
-22.35%
6M
-49.41%
1Y
-0.94%
3Y*
25.43%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*

CTA

1D
-1.31%
1M
0.45%
YTD
12.39%
6M
10.76%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VCAR vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VCAR vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCAR
VCAR Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VCAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCAR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VCAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCAR Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CTA
CTA Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCAR vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCARCTADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

0.40

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.45

0.63

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.08

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

0.66

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.10

1.14

-1.24

VCAR vs. CTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCAR Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the CTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCAR and CTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCARCTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

0.40

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.69

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between VCAR and CTA is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

VCAR vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

VCAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.62%, more than CTA's 3.81% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
VCAR
Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF
29.62%23.87%0.62%0.00%0.83%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
3.81%3.19%4.80%7.78%6.58%

Drawdowns

VCAR vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCAR drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, which is greater than CTA's maximum drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCAR and CTA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VCARCTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.11%

-18.07%

-51.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.92%

-10.68%

-43.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.82%

-1.47%

-50.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.48%

-5.74%

-31.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.42%

6.16%

+19.26%

Volatility

VCAR vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) has a higher volatility of 11.07% compared to Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) at 8.10%. This indicates that VCAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VCARCTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.07%

8.10%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.16%

12.72%

+26.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.56%

16.05%

+46.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.33%

15.58%

+33.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.22%

15.58%

+33.64%