VCAR vs. CTA
VCAR (Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF) and CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCAR is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while CTA is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VCAR returned 33.50%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for CTA. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. VCAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CTA.
Performance
VCAR vs. CTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCAR achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 12.30% return.
VCAR
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- 23.98%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- -18.80%
- 1Y
- -14.28%
- 3Y*
- 33.50%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- —
CTA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCAR vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 0.60% | -14.73% | 152.27% | 58.33% | -49.45% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 12.30% | 0.88% | 24.15% | -2.23% | 9.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCAR and CTA is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2022 | -0.10 |
VCAR vs. CTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VCAR
CTA
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
VCAR
CTA
-
Basic Materials
VCAR
-
CTA
-
Communication Services
VCAR
-
CTA
-
Consumer Defensive
VCAR
-
CTA
-
Energy
VCAR
-
CTA
-
Financial Services
VCAR
-
CTA
Healthcare
VCAR
-
CTA
-
Industrials
VCAR
-
CTA
-
Real Estate
VCAR
-
CTA
-
Technology
VCAR
-
CTA
-
Utilities
VCAR
-
CTA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCAR vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank
VCAR
CTA
VCAR vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCAR | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.15 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 1.42 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 3.72 | -4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCAR | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 0.78 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.62 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
VCAR vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCAR drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, which is greater than CTA's maximum drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCAR and CTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCAR | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.11% | -18.07% | -51.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.12% | -11.00% | -45.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.12% | -11.23% | -44.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.58% | -7.86% | -29.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.70% | -5.67% | -32.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.22% | 4.19% | +27.03% |
Volatility
VCAR vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) has a higher volatility of 24.38% compared to Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) at 7.76%. This indicates that VCAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCAR | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.38% | 7.76% | +16.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.08% | 17.30% | +23.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.90% | 20.12% | +36.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.69% | 16.58% | +34.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.02% | 16.58% | +33.44% |
VCAR vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
VCAR vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison
VCAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.86%, more than CTA's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 4.85% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% |
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 22.86% | 23.87% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCAR and CTA have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCAR has higher volatility (24.38%) compared to CTA (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCAR dropped -69.11% vs CTA's -18.07%.
On 3-year performance, VCAR leads with 33.50% vs 11.79% for CTA. On fees, CTA is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, CTA has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VCAR has performed better with a 33.50% return vs 11.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CTA is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for VCAR.
VCAR has the higher dividend yield at 22.86%, compared with 4.85% for CTA.
VCAR is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while CTA is Systematic Trend. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for VCAR and 0.78% for CTA.
CTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCAR and CTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer