VC vs. ULS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Visteon Corporation (VC) and UL Solutions Inc (ULS).

Performance

VC vs. ULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Visteon Corporation (VC) and UL Solutions Inc (ULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VC vs. ULS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VC Visteon Corporation	-3.82%	7.73%	-18.51%
ULS UL Solutions Inc	8.87%	59.33%	43.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap VC : $2.52B ULS : $19.02B
EPS VC : $16.69 ULS : $1.57
PE Ratio VC : 5.46 ULS : 54.52
PEG Ratio VC : 0.05 ULS : 4.97
PS Ratio VC : 0.67 ULS : 5.88
PB Ratio VC : 1.61 ULS : 14.70
Total Revenue (TTM) VC : $3.77B ULS : $3.05B
Gross Profit (TTM) VC : $532.00M ULS : $1.50B
EBITDA (TTM) VC : $395.00M ULS : $751.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VC achieves a -3.82% return, which is significantly lower than ULS's 8.87% return.

VC

• 1D: 6.30%
• 1M: -4.39%
• YTD: -3.82%
• 6M: -23.48%
• 1Y: 18.43%
• 3Y*: -16.31%
• 5Y*: -6.06%
• 10Y*: 1.70%

ULS

• 1D: 4.27%
• 1M: 2.25%
• YTD: 8.87%
• 6M: 21.34%
• 1Y: 53.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VC vs. ULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VC

VC Risk / Return Rank: 55
VC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
VC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
VC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
VC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

ULS

ULS Risk / Return Rank: 79
ULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ULS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ULS Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VC vs. ULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visteon Corporation (VC) and UL Solutions Inc (ULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VC	ULS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	1.32	-0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	1.98	-1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.28	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	2.26	-1.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.06	5.85	-4.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VC vs. ULS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VC Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the ULS Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VC and ULS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VC	ULS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	1.32	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	1.73	-1.56

Correlation

The correlation between VC and ULS is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VC vs. ULS - Dividend Comparison

VC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than ULS's 0.62% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
VC Visteon Corporation	1.02%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	54.02%
ULS UL Solutions Inc	0.62%	0.66%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

VC vs. ULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VC drawdown since its inception was -70.89%, which is greater than ULS's maximum drawdown of -24.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VC and ULS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VC	ULS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.89%	-24.34%	-46.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.97%	-24.34%	-9.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.33%	-5.87%	-40.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.89%	-5.70%	-17.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.35%	9.40%	+6.95%

Volatility

VC vs. ULS - Volatility Comparison

Visteon Corporation (VC) and UL Solutions Inc (ULS) have volatilities of 9.48% and 9.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VC	ULS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.48%	9.57%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.73%	29.81%	-3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.85%	40.33%	-2.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.97%	34.50%	+4.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.32%	34.50%	+6.82%

Financials

VC vs. ULS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Visteon Corporation and UL Solutions Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Visteon Corporation reported a gross profit of 122.00M and revenue of 948.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

ULS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 385.82M and revenue of 789.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.

VC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Visteon Corporation reported an operating income of 68.00M and revenue of 948.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

ULS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported an operating income of 118.35M and revenue of 789.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.0%.

VC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Visteon Corporation reported a net income of 276.00M and revenue of 948.00M, resulting in a net margin of 29.1%.

ULS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a net income of 71.00M and revenue of 789.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.