VBR vs. VWO
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBR returned 10.50%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for VWO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
VBR vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 10.50%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.
VBR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 24.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
VBR vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 11.45% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and VWO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.67 |
The correlation between VBR and VWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VBR vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBR
VWO
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
VBR
VWO
Financial Services
VBR
VWO
Consumer Cyclical
VBR
VWO
Technology
VBR
VWO
Real Estate
VBR
VWO
Healthcare
VBR
VWO
Basic Materials
VBR
VWO
Energy
VBR
VWO
Utilities
VBR
VWO
Consumer Defensive
VBR
VWO
Communication Services
VBR
VWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
VWO
VBR vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBR | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 2.18 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 7.79 | +2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBR | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.49 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.27 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.45 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.26 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
VBR vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -67.68% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -11.17% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -17.37% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -32.60% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | -36.39% | -8.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -4.67% | +3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -15.81% | +7.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 3.12% | -0.61% |
Volatility
VBR vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.67%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 6.29% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 13.80% | -3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.16% | 16.37% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 17.45% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 19.23% | +2.51% |
VBR vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBR vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than VWO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBR and VWO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to VBR (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.50% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.76% for VBR.
VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.08% for VWO.
VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBR and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer