VBR vs. SCHA
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBR returned 10.50%/yr vs 10.95%/yr for SCHA. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
VBR vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 17.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBR having a 10.50% annualized return and SCHA not far ahead at 10.95%.
VBR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 24.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
SCHA
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 17.78%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 36.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
VBR vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 11.45% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 17.78% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and SCHA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | 0.96 |
The correlation between VBR and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VBR vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBR
SCHA
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
VBR
SCHA
Financial Services
VBR
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
VBR
SCHA
Technology
VBR
SCHA
Real Estate
VBR
SCHA
Healthcare
VBR
SCHA
Basic Materials
VBR
SCHA
Energy
VBR
SCHA
Utilities
VBR
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
VBR
SCHA
Communication Services
VBR
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
SCHA
VBR vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBR | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 3.84 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 14.05 | -4.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBR | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 2.00 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.29 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.57 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
VBR vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -42.41% | -19.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -9.50% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -27.29% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -30.79% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | -42.41% | -2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -2.50% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -7.58% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.59% | -0.08% |
Volatility
VBR vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.67%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 5.79% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 13.28% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.16% | 18.31% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 21.98% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 22.74% | -1.00% |
VBR vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBR vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than SCHA's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VBR and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHA has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to VBR (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 10.95% vs 10.50% for VBR. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 10.95% return vs 10.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBR.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.02% for SCHA.
VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBR and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer