PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. RLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VBR having a 14.60% return and RLY slightly higher at 15.03%. Over the past 10 years, VBR has outperformed RLY with an annualized return of 10.99%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.43% annualized return.


VBR

1D
0.87%
1M
4.91%
YTD
14.60%
6M
12.92%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
10.99%

RLY

1D
0.47%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
15.03%
6M
15.93%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
8.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
14.60%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
15.03%20.26%2.53%2.56%7.86%22.85%-0.59%15.63%-11.72%10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and RLY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between VBR and RLY has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VBR vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBR
RLY

Industrials

18.1%
16.5%

Financial Services

17.6%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
2.6%

Technology

10.6%

-

Real Estate

10.1%
5.4%

Healthcare

7.9%
0.8%

Basic Materials

6.3%
25.1%

Energy

5.2%
30.1%

Utilities

4.8%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.6%

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Industrials

VBR
18.1%
RLY
16.5%

Financial Services

VBR
17.6%
RLY
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VBR
12.4%
RLY
2.6%

Technology

VBR
10.6%
RLY

-

Real Estate

VBR
10.1%
RLY
5.4%

Healthcare

VBR
7.9%
RLY
0.8%

Basic Materials

VBR
6.3%
RLY
25.1%

Energy

VBR
5.2%
RLY
30.1%

Utilities

VBR
4.8%
RLY
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

VBR
4.0%
RLY
3.6%

Communication Services

VBR
2.5%
RLY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBRRLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.49

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

5.95

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

22.94

-11.72

VBR vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBR vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than RLY's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and RLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBRRLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-37.75%

-24.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-4.63%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-10.08%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-18.94%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

-34.17%

-11.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.37%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-9.44%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.20%

+1.30%

Volatility

VBR vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 3.25%. This indicates that VBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBRRLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

3.25%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

8.47%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.36%

10.37%

+4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

13.57%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

13.82%

+7.92%

VBR vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBR vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than RLY's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
2.92%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.71%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBR and RLY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBR has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to RLY (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs RLY's -37.75%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.99% vs 8.43% for RLY. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 1.71% for VBR.

VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while RLY is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.50% for RLY.

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and RLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer