PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. ISCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. ISCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly higher than ISCV's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has outperformed ISCV with an annualized return of 10.49%, while ISCV has yielded a comparatively lower 8.53% annualized return.


VBR

1D
0.76%
1M
2.07%
YTD
12.51%
6M
12.70%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
10.49%

ISCV

1D
1.09%
1M
2.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.48%
1Y
29.98%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
8.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. ISCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
12.51%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
11.28%10.38%9.31%16.55%-10.58%29.15%0.86%19.51%-17.39%8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and ISCV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2004

0.97

The correlation between VBR and ISCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBR vs. ISCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBR
ISCV

Industrials

18.1%
12.1%

Financial Services

17.6%
21.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
13.4%

Technology

10.6%
8.9%

Real Estate

10.1%
11.0%

Healthcare

7.9%
11.1%

Basic Materials

6.3%
5.8%

Energy

5.2%
7.2%

Utilities

4.8%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.5%
1.8%

Industrials

VBR
18.1%
ISCV
12.1%

Financial Services

VBR
17.6%
ISCV
21.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VBR
12.4%
ISCV
13.4%

Technology

VBR
10.6%
ISCV
8.9%

Real Estate

VBR
10.1%
ISCV
11.0%

Healthcare

VBR
7.9%
ISCV
11.1%

Basic Materials

VBR
6.3%
ISCV
5.8%

Energy

VBR
5.2%
ISCV
7.2%

Utilities

VBR
4.8%
ISCV
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

VBR
4.0%
ISCV
3.7%

Communication Services

VBR
2.5%
ISCV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. ISCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCV
ISCV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ISCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. ISCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBRISCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

3.25

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.96

11.31

-0.35

VBR vs. ISCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the ISCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and ISCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBRISCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.85

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.33

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.37

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.37

+0.05

Drawdowns

VBR vs. ISCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, roughly equal to the maximum ISCV drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and ISCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBRISCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-63.14%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-9.25%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-25.35%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-25.35%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

-51.56%

+6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-9.14%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.66%

-0.16%

Volatility

VBR vs. ISCV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) have volatilities of 3.89% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBRISCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

3.79%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

10.49%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

16.25%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

20.83%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

23.30%

-1.57%

VBR vs. ISCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCV's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBR vs. ISCV - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than ISCV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
1.86%2.04%2.01%2.21%2.12%1.95%2.01%2.36%2.48%1.74%2.49%2.60%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.75%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VBR and ISCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBR has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to ISCV (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs ISCV's -63.14%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.49% vs 8.53% for ISCV. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for ISCV.

ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.75% for VBR.

VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while ISCV tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.06% for ISCV.

ISCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and ISCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer