PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 9.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has outperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 10.50%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.


VBR

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.04%
6M
8.72%
YTD
15.52%
1Y
23.17%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
10.50%
ALL TIME*
9.62%

EDIV

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.79%
6M
6.50%
YTD
9.11%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
8.40%
ALL TIME*
3.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
15.52%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
9.11%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and EDIV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011

0.59

The correlation between VBR and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBR vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBR
EDIV

Financial Services

17.5%
30.3%

Industrials

17.4%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
11.9%

Technology

12.1%
9.7%

Real Estate

10.5%
3.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
1.4%

Basic Materials

6.0%
1.5%

Utilities

4.6%
2.4%

Energy

4.3%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
13.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
14.0%

Financial Services

VBR
17.5%
EDIV
30.3%

Industrials

VBR
17.4%
EDIV
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VBR
12.5%
EDIV
11.9%

Technology

VBR
12.1%
EDIV
9.7%

Real Estate

VBR
10.5%
EDIV
3.3%

Healthcare

VBR
8.3%
EDIV
1.4%

Basic Materials

VBR
6.0%
EDIV
1.5%

Utilities

VBR
4.6%
EDIV
2.4%

Energy

VBR
4.3%
EDIV
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

VBR
4.0%
EDIV
13.2%

Communication Services

VBR
2.8%
EDIV
14.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBREDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.27

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

3.70

+5.62

VBR vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBR vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than EDIV's maximum drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBREDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-53.36%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-10.36%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-13.84%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-28.32%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

-40.76%

-4.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-1.64%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-19.23%

+11.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

3.54%

-1.05%

Volatility

VBR vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 2.90%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBREDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.83%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

11.05%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

12.80%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

13.94%

+5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

17.30%

+4.36%

VBR vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBR vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than EDIV's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.16%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.78%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBR and EDIV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VBR (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.50% vs 8.40% for EDIV. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 1.78% for VBR.

VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while EDIV is Emerging Markets Equities. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.49% for EDIV.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer